Sabrina

DVD : Sabrina

Sabrina

starring: Harrison Ford, Julia Ormond, Greg Kinnear, Nancy Marchand, John Wood
directed by: Sydney Pollack



 : Sabrina
See Larger Image

List Price: $9.98
Our Price: $6.99
You Save: -$2.99 (30%)
Prices subject to change.


Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours




Audience Rating: PG (Parental Guidance Suggested)
Binding: DVD
Brand: FORD,HARRISON
EAN: 9780792178781
Format: Anamorphic, Closed-captioned, Color, Dolby, DVD-Video, Subtitled, Widescreen, NTSC
ISBN: 0792178785
Label: Paramount
Manufacturer: Paramount
Number Of Items: 1
Publisher: Paramount
Region Code: 1
Release Date: 2002-01-15
Studio: Paramount
Theatrical Release Date: 1995-12-15



Editorial Review:

















Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours


Related Items:
     see more

Related Items:



banned interdit verboden prohibido vietato proibido
  banned    interdit    verboden   vietato     prohibido    verboden  banned      vietato      interdit proibido   vietato       interdit      verboden      banned  prohibido   

Your IP has been blocked. Please perform the action below to regain access.

Code:  security image
Please enter the Code: 



Customer Reviews
Average Rating:  out of 5 stars

Rating: 5 out of 5 stars - Better than the Original!
I would say that in most cases remakes are not as good as the original but in this case I have seen them both and must say that Julia and Harrison make a great pair!



Rating: 5 out of 5 stars - love this movie
There is just something about this version of Sabrina. All of the performances given in this film were wonderful. I love the window this film gives you into the 90's, it is oh so rich. Oh and Harrison Ford! Oh dear! Love him in this film. I say it is worth a watch.



Rating: 4 out of 5 stars - Sabrina is great
I have never seen the original but I love this version. Julia Ormond is fabulous as Sabrina, lonely daughter of a chauffer to a billionare family. Its a really enjoyable film and a great romance, if you are into that sort of thing. It doesn't get over the top and its a riot to see Harrison Ford's character interact with Sabrina. They really compliment each other well and make an interesting on-screen couple. This is one of those films that I can watch over and over.



Rating: 5 out of 5 stars - Sabrina
Very good movie. Great job of remaking the original film with Bogart, Hepburn and Holden.



Rating: 5 out of 5 stars - Better the second time around
As one of those guys who admits to actually liking "Chick Flicks", the 1995 remake of "Sabrina", starring Harrison Ford, ranks as one of my favorites.

In both the 1999 and 1954 releases of Sabrina, we have a no nonsense business tycoon, Linus Larrabee (Harrison Ford / Humphrey Borgart) who works tirelessly and ruthlessly to ensure nothing ever gets in the way of the growth of his business empire. Linus learns of a developing affair between his irresponsible playboy brother David Larrabee (Greg Kinnear / William Holden) and the chauffeur's daughter (Julia Ormond / Audrey Hepburn). Fearing the situation could interfere with his business plans, since David is engaged to the daughter of his business partner, Linus injects himself into the situation, with the intention of enticing Sabrina away from his brother. His plan is to quietly entice her to Paris, from which she had recently arrived after a long absence - and then leave her there - making sure she would be comfortable and happy there, but no longer able to unwittingly interfere with his business plans.

Of course, Sabrina is not the immature, impressionable young woman Linus expects, and he is soon caught in a web of his own making.

The two versions of this story are vastly different in the details - in the 1954 release, Sabrina goes to cooking school in France. In the 1995 version, Sabrina is an intern working at a high end fashion magazine. Travel to Paris in the 1954 version is via ship, but is via the Concorde in the 1995 film. It is very interesting seeing how cultural attitudes, particularly the role of women in society, changed in the course of the 40 or so years between the two releases.

I saw the 1995 version first, then went back and rented the original. Of the two, I found the 1995 version to be much more interesting and fun to watch. (On the other hand, my parents, who saw the original version in its initial theatrical release, have the opposite opinion!)

The supporting cast is great, delivering some of the best lines in the script - usually as very dry humor, often hysterically funny: Richard Crenna and Angie Dickenson deliver superb performances as the mother and father of David Larrabee's Fiance'. The wonderful Nancy Marchand, in one of her last film roles, is perfect as the mother of Linus and David; and Dana Ivey delivers some really memorable zingers in her role as Linus's executive assistant.

All in all, a sweet, movie sprinkled with witty, dry humor and a few hysterical sight gags: a good choice for a quiet evening in front of the TV with your significant other.

If you like Sabrina, take a look at A Good Year (Widescreen Edition) starring Russell Crowe - though not quite on the same level as this film, it is a very similar sweet and funny story that is well worth watching.



read more customer reviews on Sabrina


 




- wkdescreen tv
Major Brand Electronics - Reviews




Instead of focusing solely on the search market, where Google generates most of its revenue, the company plays in multiple other markets -- leaving it vulnerable if it spreads itself too thin, analysts say.
Add to digg Add to StumbleUpon Add to Twitter Add to Slashdot

Where do you want to be at the end? Choose wisely!

via Salon

All About N-Gage have the dirt on a game that looks like it has a lot of potential: Asphalt: Urban GT.  I can't say that I've played much more than some FIFA and other random stuff on the N-Gage, but a good racer can add a lot of value to a gaming platform.  Of course I'm still waiting to see if Call of Duty rocks as much as it should.


Ted Shelton: "Frankly I felt that BlogOn was a waste of time and money."

I think the BlogOn conference was overproduced. In the name of professionalism the organizing firm turned off potential speakers, oversubscribed sponsors, etc.

I would have liked a debatable topic (aside from *blogging = journalism*. Two people slugging it out. Or a devil's advocate taking challenges from the floor.

I would have liked more hard numbers. Facts. Charts. Diagrams. We have the analytic tools to BS-check them; harder on vague opinions and single-points-of-observation.

I found it disturbing how much money was being commanded (from both attendees and sponsors) for a conference at a university. Maybe it was because it was at Berkeley? Maybe we should have taken over a community college or a Cal State or a DeVry. The facilities costs would have been cheaper at least. I heard an organizer apologize and say the next one would be at a hotel, like that would have been better.

Cost wasn't the whole problem. We're at a stage where early adopters are meeting folks who want to leap the chasm. Huge gaps in knowledge, experience, context, culture, vocabulary. It's the gap.

There are huge ideas to be explored, even in the world of applying blogs to media strategy and the enterprise. And most of the big ideas weren't even on the agenda at BlogOn. Probably because it was catering to those who want to commercialize, fund, and otherwise exploit (excuse me, "get in on") the emerging medium.

Let's fork these conferences so advanced topics on business and technology and culture fit the participants. 

[a klog apart]


I've heard it said by Dave Winer and many many others: if only Dean had reinvested half the money raised into the Internet, then ...

OK, so you're the Dean Campaign Chief Information Officer in August 2003. The money starts to roll in. $20 million over six months, $2-4 million per month.

What would you spend the money on?

  1. What does your monthly budget look like?
  2. What is your application and infrastructure portfolio?
  3. How much will you allocate to maintenance?
  4. You're building from scratch, so what problems do you hope to avoid through wise architecture?
  5. What are your big milestones?
  6. Who are your key vendors?

How do you spend in consonance with the campaign strategy?

  1. How will you use the Internet to bring offline voters into the campaign at the same numbers as radio or television broadcasts?
  2. What is your online strategy for responding to attack ads and opposition pundits in radio, television and print?
  3. Online community takes time to build and is very hard to organize geographically. What will you do to match the state-by-state primary schedule?
  4. What can you do with online services to serve the campaign in caucus states?
  5. You are preparing for Bush to launch in Spring 2004. What are your countermeasures to reach out to moderate Republicans online while the GOP uses its advanced voter email systems to barrage 200 million validated email addresses?
  6. How will you lower the cost-per-vote vs. the GOP?





Sabrina

Shopping