Shine a Light

DVD : Shine a Light

Shine a Light

starring: Rolling Stones
directed by: Martin Scorsese



 : Shine a Light
See Larger Image

List Price: $34.99
Our Price: $18.99
You Save: -$16.00 (46%)
Prices subject to change.


Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours




Aspect Ratio: 2.35:1
Audience Rating: PG-13 (Parental Guidance Suggested)
Binding: DVD
Brand: SHINE A LIGHT (DVD MOVIE)
EAN: 0973635187470
Format: AC-3, Color, Dolby, Dubbed, DVD-Video, Subtitled, Widescreen, NTSC
Label: Paramount
Manufacturer: Paramount
Number Of Items: 1
Publisher: Paramount
Region Code: 1
Release Date: 2008-07-29
Studio: Paramount
Theatrical Release Date: 2008-04-04



Editorial Review:

















Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours


Related Items:
     see more

Related Items:



banned interdit verboden prohibido vietato proibido
  banned    interdit    verboden   vietato     prohibido    verboden  banned      vietato      interdit proibido   vietato       interdit      verboden      banned  prohibido   

Your IP has been blocked. Please perform the action below to regain access.

Code:  security image
Please enter the Code: 



Customer Reviews
Average Rating:  out of 5 stars

Rating: 5 out of 5 stars - A GREAT MOVIE
My husband is a dyed in the wool Stones fan. We saw this movie in an IMAX theater and I knew I had to get it for him for his birthday. He loves anything Stones



Rating: 3 out of 5 stars - way way way past their prime
i've been a stones' fan since they started in '63.especially liked their music when brian jones was a member, and when he died mick taylor did great work. started losing my enthusiasm when ron wood joined the band, and it's been down hill ever since. that being said, i still purchased this concert film because it was directed by the great scorcese.
although the stones sounded pretty much like i thought they would, not great; i was disappointed with scorcese, because i expected something in 'the last waltz' vein, but this doesn't come close. this is not a concert dvd that i will be going back to very often. my expectations were too high, but i should have known better. in 'the last waltz' "the band" knew when it was time to go their separate ways; the stones should have also realized that a long time ago. it would have saved them the embarrassment of playing at the super bowl. have they no pride? i guess, for them,especially in the recent past, it was always for the money.
next stop: perhaps a regularly scheduled lounge act in vegas.



Rating: 5 out of 5 stars - rolling stones - shine a light
this is a must see for all stones fans. these guys are still rocking better than any band can!



Rating: 5 out of 5 stars - Mick Jagger 3 Stories High
When I saw Shine A Light in IMAX, Mick and Keith were 3 stories high and it wasn't enough. I had to go back and see it twice. This is the best rockn'roll film of the Greatest Rockn'roll band in the World. If they can't rock you, nobody can.



Rating: 3 out of 5 stars - Why did Scorsese direct this?
First off, I am a world class Stones fan. I am also a Scorsese fan. I don't see what this great director added to the Stones legacy. There are plenty of Rolling Stones concerts from the last twenty years on DVD. The last two tours were heavily documented by the Stones themselves. This production is nothing special. I think some of the concerts filmed by the Stones are better. The only thing to sell this particular product with is the inclusion of songs not previously on DVD, such as Tears Go By and She Was Hot. Jack White's duet was not particularly good. Christina Aguilera's was better, and Buddy Guy was probably the best of the star turns. But this is not riveting stuff. The fans need a more historical documentary, since 25X5 has never been issued on DVD. There has to be a ton of interesting footage from Brian Jones onward. Go ask Bill Wyman, he's probably got the motherlode squirreled away. As for 'Shine A Light', I don't get it. What did Martin Scorsese add?




read more customer reviews on Shine a Light


 




 widescreeb tv
Baby   Shopper




Instead of focusing solely on the search market, where Google generates most of its revenue, the company plays in multiple other markets -- leaving it vulnerable if it spreads itself too thin, analysts say.
Add to digg Add to StumbleUpon Add to Twitter Add to Slashdot

Where do you want to be at the end? Choose wisely!

via Salon

All About N-Gage have the dirt on a game that looks like it has a lot of potential: Asphalt: Urban GT.  I can't say that I've played much more than some FIFA and other random stuff on the N-Gage, but a good racer can add a lot of value to a gaming platform.  Of course I'm still waiting to see if Call of Duty rocks as much as it should.


Ted Shelton: "Frankly I felt that BlogOn was a waste of time and money."

I think the BlogOn conference was overproduced. In the name of professionalism the organizing firm turned off potential speakers, oversubscribed sponsors, etc.

I would have liked a debatable topic (aside from *blogging = journalism*. Two people slugging it out. Or a devil's advocate taking challenges from the floor.

I would have liked more hard numbers. Facts. Charts. Diagrams. We have the analytic tools to BS-check them; harder on vague opinions and single-points-of-observation.

I found it disturbing how much money was being commanded (from both attendees and sponsors) for a conference at a university. Maybe it was because it was at Berkeley? Maybe we should have taken over a community college or a Cal State or a DeVry. The facilities costs would have been cheaper at least. I heard an organizer apologize and say the next one would be at a hotel, like that would have been better.

Cost wasn't the whole problem. We're at a stage where early adopters are meeting folks who want to leap the chasm. Huge gaps in knowledge, experience, context, culture, vocabulary. It's the gap.

There are huge ideas to be explored, even in the world of applying blogs to media strategy and the enterprise. And most of the big ideas weren't even on the agenda at BlogOn. Probably because it was catering to those who want to commercialize, fund, and otherwise exploit (excuse me, "get in on") the emerging medium.

Let's fork these conferences so advanced topics on business and technology and culture fit the participants. 

[a klog apart]


I've heard it said by Dave Winer and many many others: if only Dean had reinvested half the money raised into the Internet, then ...

OK, so you're the Dean Campaign Chief Information Officer in August 2003. The money starts to roll in. $20 million over six months, $2-4 million per month.

What would you spend the money on?

  1. What does your monthly budget look like?
  2. What is your application and infrastructure portfolio?
  3. How much will you allocate to maintenance?
  4. You're building from scratch, so what problems do you hope to avoid through wise architecture?
  5. What are your big milestones?
  6. Who are your key vendors?

How do you spend in consonance with the campaign strategy?

  1. How will you use the Internet to bring offline voters into the campaign at the same numbers as radio or television broadcasts?
  2. What is your online strategy for responding to attack ads and opposition pundits in radio, television and print?
  3. Online community takes time to build and is very hard to organize geographically. What will you do to match the state-by-state primary schedule?
  4. What can you do with online services to serve the campaign in caucus states?
  5. You are preparing for Bush to launch in Spring 2004. What are your countermeasures to reach out to moderate Republicans online while the GOP uses its advanced voter email systems to barrage 200 million validated email addresses?
  6. How will you lower the cost-per-vote vs. the GOP?





Shine a Light

Shopping