It's June 29th and Apple is finally ready to let the public play with the iPhone. The past six months have shaped up to be the highest profile mobile phone launch ever, Apple has conjured up an...

[Thanks to dozens of spam sites using the full text of our RSS content, the feed is now only a summary. Click through to see the full story.)

Waiting patiently for the iPhone. The touch screen interests me but I have a huge music library and it only has a small amount of storage. Latest PC Laptops are too big to lug around if I want to quickly dash out for a meeting or a weekend trip. Apple eliminated the smaller of [...]

I'm not sure why this article was written, as there appears to be nothing particularly newsworthy in it: The News.com reporter Marguerite Reardon has covered muni-Fi for as long as I have, and after reading this in-depth piece, I'm left wondering whether it was assigned far too early, and she was meeting an editorial desk requirement instead of feeling like the story was ready to "print." The article looks at Network Acquisition Corp. (NAC), the allegedly interim name for the group that's taken over Phila-Fi.

One source at the Knight Center for Digital Excellence notes, "The new network owners are supposed to have a much more sustainable business model." Supposed to. Later, "Network Acquisition Company, which acquired the network, hasn't talked publicly about the details of its new plan, but it has hinted that its strategy will differ from EarthLink's." Hasn't talked publicly. Then, "[NAC and Tropos] spokespeople said the companies would talk more about the network later this month when details of the new business plan are ready." Huh.

Reardon explains digital divide issues and looks into what Wireless Philadelphia has been up to, although doesn't note that delays in EarthLink's deployment and other factors have led to just a few hundred individuals that have been assisted by the non-profit; numbers may have changed, but that was as of a few months ago. Still, Wireless Philadelphia has apparently diversified its funding sources--Reardon cites 30 now.

I think we're still coming off the doldrums of August.

Simon Brown - java tag

At the August 2008 Coding the Architecture London User Group, I presented an overview of Flex, Silverlight and JavaFX. If you've watched the video from the session, you would have seen that I wasn't very complimentary about JavaFX.

There are a number of reasons why I don't think that JavaFX is anywhere near ready for people considering building RIAs at this point in time ... quite simply, the latest preview build ships with a bunch of crippled Swing components. Granted, some of this has been talked about in the recent SDN interview; but tables are gone, tabbed panels/tabs are gone, you can't configure how scrollpanes should scroll, etc, etc. In addition to the crippled Swing components, the out-of-the-box result looks ugly when compared to Flex and Silverlight. Take a look at the screenshots in the slides from my Flex, Silverlight and JavaFX presentation for an example.

I have some other complaints about JavaFX too, which I'll admit only stem from a couple of days with it. I personally found that the error messages reported by the NetBeans plugin are cryptic and I actually couldn't get some stuff to work because the error messages just didn't make any sense. Oh, and then there's that declarative syntax. MXML and XAML are far easier to work with. Although I appreciate the folding support that you get in the JavaFX plugin, it still took me a long time to figure out what was going on when a curly brace was missing. That syntax isn't productive and I don't see anybody (especially designers) using it without some decent drag-and-drop tooling.

In Does Anyone Really Care About Desktop Java?, Bruce Eckel talks about how Sun might be taking the wrong tack with JavaFX. And I agree. Java on the desktop is a tough proposition given the competition. So then, the important questions...

• Why are Sun doing this? : I don't know, I don't understand the impetus for doing this, aside from throwing the Java brand and an inferior Flex/Silverlight competitor into the RIA mix.
• How are Sun going to be successful with JavaFX? : I don't think they will be, at least on the desktop. I'd even go so far to say that they're barking up the wrong tree with the desktop platform. Flex and Silverlight provide a better development environment in which to build RIAs, plus the end results look *much* better than out-of-the-box Swing UIs. And then there's HTML 5. Sun should forget the desktop and concentrate on where the battle is really happening at the moment - the mobile platform. Think about it, this is where all of the action is happening right now. Think iPhone and Android. Flex and Silverlight are mature platforms in comparison to these, so why not take the opportunity and battle for supremacy in the mobile arena instead?
• When will Sun be successful? : Not until they release the JavaFX mobile platform, which (I understand) will be after the desktop platform has been released. I think Sun have got their priorities wrong ... forget about the desktop and make a stance on the mobile front before it's too late. Java ME has got massive support from hardware manufacturers. Why not do the same with JavaFX before Android gets a hold on the market?

I know it's (still) early days for JavaFX, but the preview version doesn't impress. Nobody may care about Java on the desktop, so why not focus on that mobile space instead.

The proposed acquisition of Macromedia by Adobe is not a done deal. Both companies are under the scrutiny of the SEC, and it must also be approved by stockholders. While Macromedia/Adobe gives this process three to nine months, some industry analysts feel that is being overly optimistic. But assuming that all is goes as planned, Macromedia will cease to exist. Everything will be in the Adobe name and with the Adobe interface.