The Lord Of The Rings - The Motion Picture Trilogy (Widescreen Edition)

DVD : The Lord Of The Rings - The Motion Picture Trilogy (Widescreen Edition)

The Lord Of The Rings - The Motion Picture Trilogy (Widescreen Edition)

starring: Viggo Mortensen, Peter Jackson



 : The Lord Of The Rings - The Motion Picture Trilogy (Widescreen Edition)
See Larger Image







Aspect Ratio: 2.35:1
Audience Rating: PG-13 (Parental Guidance Suggested)
Binding: DVD
Brand: Warner Brothers
EAN: 0794043710827
Format: Anamorphic, Box set, DVD-Video, Widescreen, Surround Sound, Dolby, Digital Sound, Color, NTSC
Label: New Line Home Video
Manufacturer: New Line Home Video
Number Of Items: 6
Publisher: New Line Home Video
Region Code: 1
Release Date: 2004-05-25
Studio: New Line Home Video
Theatrical Release Date: 2003-12-17



Editorial Review:



















Related Items:
     see more

Related Items:



banned interdit verboden prohibido vietato proibido
  banned    interdit    verboden   vietato     prohibido    verboden  banned      vietato      interdit proibido   vietato       interdit      verboden      banned  prohibido   

Your IP has been blocked. Please perform the action below to regain access.

Code:  security image
Please enter the Code: 



Customer Reviews
Average Rating:  out of 5 stars

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars - If you are a real fan of the trilogy
buy the extended version. We had rented the series several times from our local video store and when they were out one time went to a different retailer to rent it. We had this set on order, it just hadn't arrived yet. Anyway, because of the price difference, I ordered the regular set from amazon. The second retailer we rented from in the meantime had the extended version. What a difference! There are so many extra scenes that give you more background on the storyline and the characters, which is why I rate this boxed set at 4 stars. I will probably end up buying the extended version from amazon for Christmas for my family. Also, if you haven't read the books I highly recommend that, there is even more in them than in the movie. Start with the Hobbit first then move on the the trilogy.



Rating: 5 out of 5 stars - This is not a trilogy, but a legend!
This is the most amazing movie trilogy I ever saw.The story begins nicely in the fellowship of the ring, with many beautiful sceneries and imaginative places,presented in the most beautiful way.It's very sad to see the fellowship beginning to break at some points,but nevertheless the movie flows beautifully.The two towers is the middle story, with the return of one of the main characters.The battle at Helm's Deep is magnificent with more than 10000 characters in one screen.The story takes some turning points in this movie, continuing the marvelous flow.Finally, the best movie out of the three is The Return Of The King, still remaining the most amazing movie I ever saw.The special effects and mass armies are nothing short of genius.Tears came to my eyes as I saw the final part of the movie, and it stayed in my mind for sometime.I highly recommend this trilogy for fantasy lovers,and after watching this, I think people will start loving fantasy stories.Buy this movie set,and I guarantee you that you will not be dissapointed.



Rating: 5 out of 5 stars - great series
Rewarding to me. I really appriciate the quality of direct purchases from amazon. I know it is of good quality.



Rating: 5 out of 5 stars - The unquestionable apex of modern fantasy gets a marvelous movie treatment
Of course these can't compare to the original Lord of the Rings trilogy. Considering the depth, breadth, scope, and originality of Tolkien's creative vision, how could they? It's a daunting task to make a movie out of the Lord of the Rings, since Tolkien wove a world just as realistic as our own. As such, the only attempts we had seen before The Fellowship of the Ring was adapted in 2001 were cutesy kiddie adaptations of the Hobbit and Return of the King (never mind that there are, you know, two books in between them) that featured characters with unnaturally large noses, and an odd retelling of The Fellowship of the Ring and about half of The Two Towers that had a vague, impressionistic art style and barely audible dialog. (There were also plans of a version starring the Beatles, which I, an avid Beatlemaniac, would be interested in seeing - John as Gollum, Paul as Frodo, George as Gandalf and Ringo as Sam). Needless to say, neither film has much value beyond "novelty" in this day and age.
However, I have to commend Peter Jackson for doing an excellent job with it just the same. I've more or less been a lifelong Lord of the Rings fan, and I'm impressed by every aspect of this film.
For one, the casting was perfect. Ian MacKellan (one of my favorite actors) as Gandalf, perpetual villain Christopher Lee as Saruman, Viggio Mortenson as Aragorn, Orlando Bloom as Legolas, Elijah Wood as Frodo, Lawrence Makoare and Andy Serkis collaborating for a truly ominous Witch-king of Angmar (the Nazgul Lord), Cate Blanchett as Galadriel... great choices all around. I'm especially impressed by the Gandalf-Saruman confrontations, which shame any lightsaber battle. Oh yeah, the battle scenes - Moria, Helm's Deep, Gondor - are truly epic, outstripping any others I've ever seen by a long run. True cinematic achievements!
Cutting-edge CGI technology is another point in this film worth bringing up. Gollum (played by Andy Serkis) is a cinematic revolution, essentially a CGI actor. The directors famously filmed Serkis' movements while he was attached to several video cameras, and adapted those into Gollum. Similar effort was put into the Great Eye of Sauron, and other denizens of Middle-Earth, such as the dragonlike steeds of the evil Nazgul; the cave trolls; and especially the fire-demon Balrog, a true feast for the eyes.
Oh yes, feasts for the eyes. How about that scenery? The Shire is beautiful, Gondor is majestic, the Dead Marshes are desolate, and Mordor is downright foreboding. The choice of location for the Mines of Moria alone is one of the most breathtaking sets ever chosen. Most of this was filmed in New Zealand, which means I have to go there.
Amazing soundtrack, too. I liked it so much, I actually BOUGHT it, and I'm not one who generally likes soundtracks. But this... this is different. It's never just your typical Hollywood soundtrack schmaltz. It's actually heavily rooted in Celtic folk, and I think that's very cool myself. Plus Saruman's theme is one of the few themes I honestly find menacing.
Now, for the most important part. Peter Jackson definitely leaves a few plot points out (Where's Tom Bombadil?), but on a whole I think he really gets deep into the heart and soul of the Lord of the Rings, in my mind the greatest book (and I say "book" because it was meant to be a single novel, and is only broken into three because of a publishing error) ever written. That's the key here. This is a guy who knows and loves Lord of the Rings, working with a cast of characters who do the same.
If you've never read the books, do so. If you have, this makes a wonderful companion. Each of these movies are three hours, so it's a big commitment to sit down and watch one. But there's a great chance that you will be rewarded.



Rating: 5 out of 5 stars - Great trilogy for Lord Of the Rings
I read all the Lord of the Ring books before there were movies. Wonderful story. It's been a while since I read the books, but I do believe these 3 movies follow the books. So if you are into Hobbits and wizards, this movie
trilogy would make a great item for your collection.



read more customer reviews on The Lord Of The Rings - The Motion Picture Trilogy (Widescreen Edition)


 




-  wieescreen tv
Major Brand Electronics -  Reviews




Ted Shelton: "Frankly I felt that BlogOn was a waste of time and money."

I think the BlogOn conference was overproduced. In the name of professionalism the organizing firm turned off potential speakers, oversubscribed sponsors, etc.

I would have liked a debatable topic (aside from *blogging = journalism*. Two people slugging it out. Or a devil's advocate taking challenges from the floor.

I would have liked more hard numbers. Facts. Charts. Diagrams. We have the analytic tools to BS-check them; harder on vague opinions and single-points-of-observation.

I found it disturbing how much money was being commanded (from both attendees and sponsors) for a conference at a university. Maybe it was because it was at Berkeley? Maybe we should have taken over a community college or a Cal State or a DeVry. The facilities costs would have been cheaper at least. I heard an organizer apologize and say the next one would be at a hotel, like that would have been better.

Cost wasn't the whole problem. We're at a stage where early adopters are meeting folks who want to leap the chasm. Huge gaps in knowledge, experience, context, culture, vocabulary. It's the gap.

There are huge ideas to be explored, even in the world of applying blogs to media strategy and the enterprise. And most of the big ideas weren't even on the agenda at BlogOn. Probably because it was catering to those who want to commercialize, fund, and otherwise exploit (excuse me, "get in on") the emerging medium.

Let's fork these conferences so advanced topics on business and technology and culture fit the participants. 

[a klog apart]


Blindspots is a continually-updated collection of movie reviews based around one very interesting concept -- how accessible they are to the visually impaired.
Movies that score high in accessibility include "The American President" (10/10) and "Ghosts of Mississippi" (9/10). At the other end of the scale are "101 Dalmatians", "Buddy", and "Spawn", each receiving 2/10.

Java Entrepreneur

Sun Microsystems has announced plans to cut between 5,000 and 6,000 jobs — that's between 15 and 18 percent of its workforce.

"It blamed the cuts on the global economic downturn, but I think that like many other companies, Sun is using the downturn as an excuse for what were pre-existing problems, foretold by its stock price, which seems to be in an unending swoon," suggests GigaOM's Om Malik.

"How much has Sun spent to develop Solaris or Java?" asks InfoWorld's Neil McAllister. "How much must it continue to invest in maintaining other products, which, despite being open source, have no appreciable development community? To say these products are not loss leaders suggests something akin to Hollywood accounting."

The answer? "Spin off Java," McAllister added in a later post. "Just get rid of it — farm it out to an industry consortium and let the companies that depend upon it manage it..."

More here from CNET News ... more here from the Guardian ... more here from ZDNet ... more here from TG Daily ... and the press release is here.

See full article.

Related Entries:

Sun Microsystems Comes Up With RFID Based Java Net Community Website - 14 May 2006

Welcome 2007 with Open-Source Java - 25 October 2006

EarthLink Fires Half of its Workforce - 28 August 2007

Sprint is Bleeding - 18 January 2008




Contents of this feed are a property of Creative Weblogging Limited and are protected by copyright laws. Violations will be prosecuted. Please email us if you'd like to use this feed for non-commercial activities at feeds - at - creative-weblogging.com.






The Lord Of The Rings - The Motion Picture Trilogy (Widescreen Edition)

Shopping